The Soul of Money
Transforming Your Relationship with Money and Life
by Lynne Twist
Reviewed by Steve Schullo
The Soul of Money: Transforming Your Relationship with Money and Life
by Lynne Twist
Reviewed by Steve Schullo
I loved this book because it brings up a needed discussion on two opposing and conflicting values over money.
- The dominated and respected quantitative analyses view: the analytical, sophisticated, science-based, and higher status by the investment communities, financial institutions, do-it-yourselfers, and the financial professionals (Author calls this “Money and Me”).
- The less respected and lower status qualitative analyses view: memoir type, feeling-based, and the psychology of money (Author calls this “Money and Us”).
Investors who do not have an adviser (do-it-yourself—DIY), ordinary folks like this reviewer, complain that the public, spouses, friends and relatives are not interested discovering the investment process. Perhaps it’s because the quantitative analysis conversation dominates the bookstores and online discussion forums. Arcane vocabulary, acronyms, numbers, models, Excel spreadsheets, and formulas excite only a tiny group of investment savvy people. Is it that big of a surprise that the public is rightfully turned off?
Enter the qualitative analyses side of the conversation: The Soul of Money is an attempt to motivate the folks that don’t understand or are intimated by the impersonal language of the quantitative analyses communities. I applauded the author and gave her five stars because she took on an enormous challenge and did as best any author could do under the circumstances. The public would benefit with more books and articles which make the qualitative side of the debate a constant conversation.
Money and me vs. money and us. The dominant conversation about the Money and Me “values” is tough with the winner-take-all world of financial industry. Winning is much sexier and powerful sounding than the boring balanced, soul-based, emotional and “touchy-feely” experiences. The airwaves are 100% “Money and Me.” But the qualitative conversation of “Money and Us” will help us find inner peace and individual happiness for us and the world. Also, we want more of the public managing their money.
The next time your uncle, the do-it-yourselfer investor, brags about how smart he is because he got lucky over a huge investment return, remind him what you will learn from this book. Be respectful and calmly begin a conversation about the proper balance between money as a means to an end vs. money as a means to more and deeper meaningful relationships.
Of course, we love our “uncles,” and the quantitative community means well. Their value system reeks with too much status and prestige to being “rich.” The online financial forums are full of “uncles.” I have learned from these same financial forums where I hang out, and I think everyone would benefit too. However, this book speaks to my value system of placing money and material things in its place.
It finishes the job about seeking a healthy financial balance. You don’t have to learn most of their complicated investment terminology to construct a Zen-type, low-cost, diversified portfolio.
Here are some of my favorite Chapters:
- “This thing we call money”
- “Scarcity vs. Sufficiency”
- “Human values to consumer values”
“This Thing We Call Money.” Quoting from the book as she takes us through the history of money: ”…money was invented to facilitate the sharing of exchanging goods and services among individuals and groups….” Humans began attributing power to money over the centuries. We need to get back to the conversation of money’s original facilitative role. Since the middle ages, religious leaders of the time frowned at people talking about money publicly. Silence has made the situation far worse because we are drowned out by the dominating marketing, sales and the “sophisticated” financial conversation.
Just turn on CNBC and listen to the nonstop petty issues:
- monetary policy
- interest rates
- the hot stock tip of the day
- individual stock winners and losers (of the day, week, month, quarter, and year)
- the hot mutual fund manager for the year
- hot hedge fund manager of the year
- endless and useless predictions of the stock market, bond market, and individual company stocks performance by the end of today, next week, next month, next quarter and at the end of the year
- and the biggest distraction—domestic and international politics, North Korea, Iran, Syria and all its machinations.
The above topics are unhealthy, unrealistic and overly complicated for us ordinary consumers: Quoting from the book: “…somewhere along the way the power we give money outstripped its original utilitarian role.” We cannot compete when Wall Street and the nonstop financial media has all the cards and monopolizes the conversation with useless topics named. IGNORE all of those topics and news items–we have no control anyway, except at the ballot box. The author argued that we must find our way back to the original “utilitarian role.” She shared many examples with different cultures and countries of her passion, “Hunger Project,” fundraising, and organizing to finance good causes.
The financial industry was developed and sold the idea that money, and the management of it, is external. Do we need smart and sophisticated “experts” trained in Ivy League schools using powerful computer technology to quantify, predict, create ever more powerful and persuasive sales pitches to sell the newest and hottest investment idea? No! But Wall Street has done well, and their secret has almost always been to make money whether the stock and bond market goes up or down. That’s not the “utilitarian role.” The passive investment strategy communities would agree to keep your money away from Wall Street and the big banks because of high costs and active management failures.
Enough. The author’s discussion of “scarcity” vs. “sufficiency” was particularly relevant, especially to those of us who live and practice frugal living to be financially independent. Scarcity might be the basis of the incentive argument coming from the father of capitalism. Adam Smith has a valid argument for business owners about incentives. But Lynne, the author, was talking to us consumers. While she did not specifically say this, I understood her to say to me on what I have practiced about purchasing cars. Do we have to trade in our 3-year-old car that still runs great and it is paid off? No, just because everybody trades their 3-year-old car in for a new car, and has chronic car payments. The sufficiency model argues for keeping your cars for ten or more years because that used car is “enough.” Furthermore, the one-bathroom house is enough and sending your children to good public schools and colleges is “enough.”
Powerful stuff. But consumers underestimate how costly in money and stress the perverse incentive of keeping-Up-With-the-Jones and the powerful and corporate systemic resistance to having “enough.” Once again, the personal finance community would agree about living within your means and saving and investing for the future ensures less stress. When you have less stress, you are happier. When you are happy, you have evolved into a better human being.
Speaking of “enough,” when the author published her book, it was before John Bogle’s book of the same name “Enough.” She would have loved Mr. Bogle’s book because he supported the same life philosophy (see my review of Bogle’s “Enough”). As we know, Bogle has a solid right foot in the quantitative side of the argument, but his left foot is in the “Soul of Money” too. He is one of the most respected investment thought leaders of the 20th and 21st centuries. The octogenarian is the founder of the indexing strategy empire and Vanguard Group. But he too was (and still is) subjected to criticism from Wall Street “Money and Me” power. I believe the author and Mr. Bogle would have very similar life philosophies regarding the utilitarian role of money in our lives.
The rest of my review is about this author’s attempt at establishing that lasting conversation. I just don’t think a concise language exists yet that can effectively argue this balance between the quantitative (statistics) with the qualitative side (feelings). There are the usual criticisms of the feeling side of money books: repetitive, long, too personal, not “tough” or strong enough with solid science, statistics and tables, and graphs. But these criticisms of being wishy-washy, “touchy-feely” or even support a socialist takeover of the government are over-the-top hilarious and offensive. What do the negative reviewers expect from a money book that has “Soul” in its title?
Living within our means, being happy with what you have, and saving for a rainy day have been basic to American values since the beginning of our republic. But somewhere along the way, my baby boomer generation took the consumer side of bigger and newer things than ever before. The author accurately summarizes how our country’s values have shifted from “qualities of citizenry and personal character to consumer spending and economics: from human values to consumer values.” She is spot on, and I think we can all agree Americans spend too much.
All the major and minor religious teachings preach that “wealth” of sharing and helping others brings happiness to both others and ourselves. Last I heard, we all want to be happy. Thanks to the millennial generation blogosphere, there are many online financial independent communities with millions of views (Mr. Money Mustache is the perfect example with millions of readers). We are beginning to change the conversation to what the author outlines: less is more, less material things, less stress, change your dreams from the unhealthy radical individualism and harmful self-cherishing to helping the entire planet be a better place for everyone.
Amazon link The Soul of Money.
*Stephen A. Schullo, Ph.D. (UCLA ’96) taught in the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) for 24 years and UCLA Extension teaching educational technology to student teachers. Steve wrote investment articles for the United Teacher-Los Angeles (UTLA) newspaper for 13 years. Thrice featured retirement plan advocate in the Los Angeles Times and U.S. News and World Report. He co-founded an investor self-help group (403bAware with a colleague, Sandy Keaton) for teacher colleagues and wrote 6,500 posts in three investment forums since 1997. Frequently quoted by the media, testified at California State legislative hearings and honored with the “Unsung Hero” award by UTLA for his retirement planning advocacy.
For the last eleven years, he continues to serve on LAUSD’s Investment Advisory Committee as a “Member-at-Large” and former co-chair. The committee monitors the district’s 457b/403b/PARS of 55,000 former and current LAUSD employees, worth $2.2 billion in total assets. Lastly, Steve and his late husband, Dan, were featured participants for the award-winning documentary, PBS Frontline: The Retirement Gamble, aired April 23, 2013.
Steve is the author of an additional new book, released last year, “Fighting Powerful Interests: Educators Challenge Tax-sheltered Annuities and WIN!” A story of how a handful of LAUSD educators struggled for years to improve the 403(b) to no avail. But we never quit! We were instrumental in LAUSD’s implementation of the new 457(b) plan, and ended up with a “Plan Design” award.